Re: [info-performer] Nvidia and ATI cards comparison

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Marc Mendez (mmendez++at++silicon-worlds.fr)
Date: 09/03/2003 00:41:22


'morning everybody,

first, thanks to all who answered for the one who read carefully all this 8)
Everything I was supposing has been confirmed and, not to advertise for
nVidia, I just wanted to tell that the nV FX5[689]00 cards are the best
ones I ve tested for a while at that price and that they ve much
improved since the GF3-4 products.

I ll have some more ... but I need to check out, in a different class,
the new Onyx4 UV ;)

Have a good pfDay,
    Marc.

>>
>>I was wondering about ATI cards. I ve always used nvidia chips-based
>>ones and when I talk with gamers they all appear to prefer ATI Radeon
>>cards, maybe they're worth it 8) No ?
>>
>>
>>
>Hi Marc,
>as has been posted already the ATI linux support for the high end cards
>is still somewhat poor. A couple of weeks ago we bought two new linux
>boxes with the Radeon 9800. But the 9700 driver did not work on that
>cards (should have investigated earlier, i know). There is a "ghost"
>driver on a german web side which handles a totally different card but
>was told to be usable with the 9800, we tried that but did not succeed
>(i think the Xserver started but produced locks after a while, have to
>ask a colleague). But we could exchange the cards for NV FX ones ;)
>
>
>
>
>>So has anyone led some testing comparison that could reveal that one or
>>the other is faster, stability, ... on a Linux box of course ?
>>
>>pfCheers,
>> Marc.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Marc Mendez
Silicon Worlds SA

12, rue de Chatillon 75014 Paris Tel : +33 (01) 53 90 11 13 Fax : +33 (01) 53 90 11 12

Without C, we would only have Basi, Pasal and Obol. Anonymous. Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. P. Picasso.


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 03 2003 - 00:45:06 PDT