[info-performer]

From: Rémy Deslignes (rdeslignes++at++silicon-worlds.fr)
Date: 05/16/2003 02:11:18

• Next message: Pawel A. Hernik: "[info-performer] Problems with RedHat 9 and PF3"
• Previous message: Rémy Deslignes: "[info-performer]"
• Next in thread: Yair Kurzion: "Re: [info-performer]"

pfHi(),

I'm working on a scenegraph-based application using pfenginess massively.
My transform nodes use ( of course ? ) pfFCSs.

'Of course' I get a problem with culling. This seems to be a common problem
with pfFCSs ( as they said in the OpenGL Performer Programmer's Guide:
Chapter 16. Dynamic Data ).

So my question(s) is (are) :

- What is the point of using pfFCS if bouding boxes are not actualised ?
Who can use this ? Are pfFCSs useless ? - Is there a way of avoiding this
incorrect culling ? Note that I would like to keep the advantages of my
engines and not modify my bounding boxes each frame ...

pfThanks() for any pfHelp* .

Remy

• Next message: Pawel A. Hernik: "[info-performer] Problems with RedHat 9 and PF3"
• Previous message: Rémy Deslignes: "[info-performer]"
• Next in thread: Yair Kurzion: "Re: [info-performer]"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 16 2003 - 02:18:14 PDT