Re: [info-performer] Performer 3.0 and pthreads

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Goncalo Carvalho (g.carvalho++at++gsa.ac.uk)
Date: 04/03/2003 01:26:34


Hey,

I would like to share my experience on this.

First I use ACE extensively with Performer and never seen any of these
problems. I don't use TAO
so I don't know if it is related to it or not.

I've sucessfully compiled ACE on IRIX, Windows and Linux and succesfully
linked applications with it
and Performer.

These applications run on all platforms and on systems that were not
configured by me. For instance
the same application ran fine on SGI's RealityCenter in Reading, UK.

On Linux, I use a RedHat 7.3 system with g++ 3.2.1 compiled by me. I
never had any problems with template
instantiation. Everything compiles out of the box.

I don't know if this helps but I can send you my .so for Linux and the
includes.

Goncalo

"Gatewood, Pat" wrote:
>
> I am using gcc-2.96. I have recompiled the ACE wrappers and TAO without
> exceptions and without optimization. My API still works without the
> Performer libs and segraults with them (still not actually calling any
> Performer code.
>
> When I tried compiling under RedHat 8.0 and the gcc3.2 compiler I ran into
> problems with template instantiation. It seems like I am going to have a
> lot of problems going that way.
>
> I have the performer part compiled under gcc2.96 without the API and it
> seems to work ok. Unfortunately it is necessary for the API to be linked
> with the Performer application.
>

-- 
Goncalo Carvalho
Digital Design Studio - Glasgow School of Art
House for an Art Lover - Bellahouston Park
10 Dumbreck Road 
Glasgow G41 5BW
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0) 141 353 4616 Fax: +44 (0) 141 353 4422 Mobile: +44 (0) 7766 295867 mailto:g.carvalho++at++gsa.ac.uk


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 03 2003 - 01:32:14 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.