From: Marc Mendez (mmendez++at++silicon-worlds.fr)
Date: 04/01/2003 07:55:19
pfHello !
Hope everyone is doing fine !
I m working on an abstract, really object-prone, paradigmful application
based on engines and fluxes and that s all 8)
I ve just run some tests where I write an engine that has an input:
pfGetFrameTimeFlux() and one output, the time (it just copies the value
from one flux to another).
I ve put, for warming up my CPUs, 200 engines chained together. But
nothing was displayed.
Then I ve decreased I ve decreased I ve decreased the engine number to
10 to see my penguin again ...
Trying this test with 200 engines all connected to the
pfGetFrameTimeFlux() as an input (in parallel, not in chain) doesn t
slow the application. Only engine chaining slows everything a lot.
As I d like to build some complex simulations data path where ten or
twenty engines may be involved, I d like to get more performances here !
Is this normal ? Is there something to do to get more perfs ? Should I
code in assembler ?
Thanks for your help/ideas/remarks,
Marc.
PS: I almost forgot to tell you that I ve tested with my C__ design
patterns-full application **AND** pfFluxes and pfEngines directly.
I may send you the PF sample code based on simple.C
-- Marc Mendez Silicon Worlds SA12, rue de Chatillon 75014 Paris Tel : +33 (01) 53 90 11 13 Fax : +33 (01) 53 90 11 12
Without C, we would only have Basi, Pasal and Obol. Anonymous. Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. P. Picasso.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 01 2003 - 07:56:57 PST