Re: [info-performer] Windows Apps portability

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Dan Johnston (dan.johnston++at++nrc.ca)
Date: 03/18/2003 11:11:44


Mike Greene wrote:

> A simple question - if I have a bought version of Performer for Windows
> (which I assume would be node-locked to my development machine), would the
> apps themselves be portable to other machines or do you have to have a
> license for each target machine. I'm looking at maybe building a viz on a
> high-performance desktop machine and then taking it around to demo on
> laptops. Is this feasible? (This is the way most windows API's work - you
> simply have to make sure you carry around the correct .dll's with the
> installed app).
>

That is what I am doing.

I develop on a high end machine - in my case a 5 Pipe ONYX Monster -
because the error messages from MS-Windows are not helpful and
I am much more productive with the UNIX development tools.

Then, when the application is working, I copy the source and data
files down to a MS-Windows box to show to people who cannot
seem to realise that there is more to computers than something
derived from Microsoft.

It works for me.

BTW: I assume you know that there is a demo version of OpenGL
Performer for MS-Windows that you can put on any of your
laptops. It just adds a 'powered by performer' message in the
top right corner, but otherwise works just the same.

Good luck!

--
      ___|__    |
      /  |  \   ||\      Daniel (Dan) Johnston
     /___|___\  || \     Dan.Johnston++at++nrc.gc.ca
    _____|____  ||  \    National Research Council of Canada, London, ON
    |    |    | ||   \   Integrated Manufacturing Technologies Institute
\___|    |    | ||____\  Tel: (519) 430-7081   Fax: (519) 430-7090
 \_o_\___|____|_|______\_    Inst: http://www.nrc.ca/imti
  \                o /    These opinions are my own! Not those of NRC.
   \________________/    Virtual Reality:
                        http://www.nrc.ca/imti/vetc/home.html
 More Tall Ships - Fewer Computers!


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:12:19 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.