Re: [info-performer] Using Qt and Performer API - Redefinition of 'ulong'

From: Jason Daly (jdaly++at++ist.ucf.edu)
Date: 01/10/2003 07:19:57

• Next message: ppagano++at++bellsouth.net: "[info-performer] Introductions and help requests"
• Previous message: Florent Coudret: "Re: [info-performer] Using Qt and Performer API - Redefinition of 'ulong'"
• In reply to: Florent Coudret: "Re: [info-performer] Using Qt and Performer API - Redefinition of 'ulong'"
• Next in thread: Alexandre Naaman: "Re: [info-performer] Using Qt and Performer API - Redefinition of 'ulong'"

On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 08:15, Florent Coudret wrote:
> Now you've just ported Performer on win2000/XP side, since no 'sproc'
> nor 'pthread' exist on these system, things seem to be more difficult to
> implement without breaking compatibility with other OS...

Just fyi, there is a pthreads implementation for Win32...

http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/

--"J"

• Next message: ppagano++at++bellsouth.net: "[info-performer] Introductions and help requests"
• Previous message: Florent Coudret: "Re: [info-performer] Using Qt and Performer API - Redefinition of 'ulong'"
• In reply to: Florent Coudret: "Re: [info-performer] Using Qt and Performer API - Redefinition of 'ulong'"
• Next in thread: Alexandre Naaman: "Re: [info-performer] Using Qt and Performer API - Redefinition of 'ulong'"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 10 2003 - 07:22:08 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.