[info-performer] Using Qt and Performer API - Redefinition of 'ulong'

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Florent Coudret (florent.coudret++at++cstb.fr)
Date: 01/08/2003 07:24:22

Hello,
developing a Qt-Performer based viewer, we're facing an annoying
redefinition of 'ulong' between both API:
In include\Performer\wintypes.h, we have:
    typedef unsigned ulong;
whereas in Qt\include\qglobal.h, we have:
    typedef unsigned long ulong;
Don't you (SGI gurus...) think the second one should be more correct ?

More generally, do you (or someone else on this mailing-list) have
experiences/simple examples of combining Performer with Qt library ?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 08 2003 - 07:26:14 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.