Re: [info-performer] Performer Licensing for Windows

From: c.mottram (ucftchr++at++ucl.ac.uk)
Date: 11/19/2002 06:43:45

• Next message: Ong Tze Lin: "RE: [info-performer] subclassing pf classes"
• Previous message: Claudio Rufa: "[info-performer] Kylix 3 and Performer"
• Maybe in reply to: Manne Baum: "[info-performer] Performer Licensing for Windows"
• Next in thread: Allan Schaffer: "Re: [info-performer] Performer Licensing for Windows"

Er this looks like the replacement/upgrade for Optimizer we've been waiting
for all these years :-)
Is this so? How does Clark feel? How many wires have I got crossed
cheers
Chiron
At 08:23 19/11/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi,
>Is there any information available about the licence conditions for coming
performer for windows?
>Would be nice to have, for planning investments this or next year.
>
>Steve
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives, Info, FAQ: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> Open Development Project: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

• Next message: Ong Tze Lin: "RE: [info-performer] subclassing pf classes"
• Previous message: Claudio Rufa: "[info-performer] Kylix 3 and Performer"
• Maybe in reply to: Manne Baum: "[info-performer] Performer Licensing for Windows"
• Next in thread: Allan Schaffer: "Re: [info-performer] Performer Licensing for Windows"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 19 2002 - 06:45:23 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.