From: Serge Kourdakov (serge++at++sat-sim.org)
Date: 05/23/2002 06:31:37
Hi Performers.
There were
> From: Tom Flynn <flynnt++at++engr.sgi.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 11:45:29 -0700
> Subject: Re: [info-performer] one new Performer 2.5.1 announce - one
thing with pfGetTime()
SK> > Any reasons for such a behaviour of pf GetTime() or maybe I do
something
SK> > wrong?
Thanks Tom for your attention.
I solved the prob by installing gdb 5.2 and gcc-3.1
pfGetTime now reports time correctly in my graphical debuggers :-)
it seems that as gcc-3.1 uses new default debug info DWARF2 output format
and gdb5.2 reads it better than previous gdb s
my probs gone ...
Thus my answers on Tom's qustions are ...
> which distro?
> which version of the distro?
Suse 8.0
> which compiler? (gcc2 or gcc3)?
gcc-3.1 /gdb/5.2 - no porbs ( the probs were on gcc3.04 and gdb-5.1.x( those
which comed with suse 8.0 distro ..)
> and since this is dealing with pfGetTime(), what's the clock speed on your
> CPU?
AthlonXP1600+ 1400 Mhz.
The only thing left ...
gcc-3.1 warns that some Performer libs are linked with libstdc++.so.3
while gcc-3.1 calls libstdc++.so.4
Is it possible to have new rpms for gcc -3.1 for downloads?
Regards
Serge
http://www.vrtainment.de
Original message
-----------------------
> From: Tom Flynn <flynnt++at++engr.sgi.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 11:45:29 -0700
> Subject: Re: [info-performer] one new Performer 2.5.1 announce - one
thing with pfGetTime()
>
in reply on
>From: "Serge Kourdakov" <serge++at++sat-sim.org>
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 17:56:11 +0400
?Subject: [info-performer] one new Performer 2.5.1 announce - one thing
with pfGetTime()
------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 06:31:34 PDT