OpenFlight loader problems in Linux (fwd)

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Jason Daly (jdaly++at++ist.ucf.edu)
Date: 12/10/2001 12:28:57


A while ago I sent the message below. I haven't received a reply yet, and
would still really appreciate one :-)

We've managed to isolate a quirk with this problem, however. It seems that
the nodes that we routinely fail to find all have eight-character node names.
When we reduce or increase the number of characters in the particular node
name, it is then able to find the node.

Perhaps the problem is not with PFFLT_CLEAN, but just the fact that eight-
character node names are getting munged when the database is converted to
the scene graph.

Any thoughts?

--"J"

"I'm a castaway stranded in a desolate land,
 I can see the footprints in the virtual sand."
        --Neil Peart

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:52:21 -0500
From: Jason Daly <jdaly++at++ist.ucf.edu>
To: info-performer++at++sgi.com
Subject: OpenFlight loader problems in Linux

The OpenFlight loader packaged with the Linux version of Performer 2.4.x
doesn't seem to acknowledge the instruction to not do flattening/cleaning.

pfdConverterMode_flt(PFFLT_CLEAN, PF_OFF);
pfdConverterMode_flt(PFFLT_FLATTEN, PF_OFF);

Despite how much I fiddle with the configuration of the loader (again, Linux
version only), it insists on flattening and/or cleaning the tree. I know
this because I wrote a small program that loads a database and searches for
a named node. Under IRIX, it finds the node, but under Linux it doesn't.

Anyone have a clue as to why this is or any solution? We've been able to
work around it so far, but it's getting annoying :-)

--"J"

"I'm a castaway stranded in a desolate land,
 I can see the footprints in the virtual sand."
        --Neil Peart


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:29:03 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.