Re: pfuInit vs. memory allocation

From: Erik Brisson (ebrisson++at++tonka.bu.edu)
Date: 10/30/2001 14:14:12

• Next message: Hugh Fisher: "Re: X - alternative to pfu?"
• Previous message: Erik Brisson: "Re: X - alternative to pfu?"

Hi Yves,

Thank you for thinking about my question. I do have the pfInit() in
place, and my code works fine on Irix, and on Linux without hardware
acceleartion. So I am still looking for the problem with acceleration.

Erik

On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 12:25:05PM +0100, Yves Strube wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did you forget to call pfInit() before?
>
> --
> Oerlikon-Contraves AG
> Yves Strube, S-EMI
> Birchstr. 155 Email: czys++at++ocag.ch
> CH-8050 Zurich Phone: +41 1 316 2675
> Switzerland Fax: +41 1 316 2032

• Next message: Hugh Fisher: "Re: X - alternative to pfu?"
• Previous message: Erik Brisson: "Re: X - alternative to pfu?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 30 2001 - 14:12:12 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.