X - alternative to pfu?

From: Erik Brisson (ebrisson++at++tonka.bu.edu)
Date: 10/29/2001 19:18:01

• Next message: Gernot Ziegler: "Re: info-performer Oct 29 2001"
• Previous message: Erik Brisson: "pfuInit vs. memory allocation"
• Next in thread: Erik Brisson: "Re: X - alternative to pfu?"
• Reply: Hugh Fisher: "Re: X - alternative to pfu?"

Hi,

As I am having problems getting the pfu routines to work in my Performer
application when porting to Linux, I am wondering if anyone has a working
code sample for handling X events which does not use the pfu routines?

Thank you,
Erik Brisson
ebrisson++at++bu.edu
Scientific Computing and Visualization Group
Boston University

• Next message: Gernot Ziegler: "Re: info-performer Oct 29 2001"
• Previous message: Erik Brisson: "pfuInit vs. memory allocation"
• Next in thread: Erik Brisson: "Re: X - alternative to pfu?"
• Reply: Hugh Fisher: "Re: X - alternative to pfu?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 29 2001 - 19:16:08 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.