Re: isect

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Yair Kurzion (yair++at++polygon.engr.sgi.com)
Date: 09/27/2001 13:56:47

Next message: Dirk Scheffter: "Hurray, isect problem solved!"
Previous message: Allan Schaffer: "Re: Performer 2.4.2 for linux and multiprocess"
In reply to: Dirk Scheffter: "RE: isect"

>
> Just a stupid idea:
>
> Is it necessary to call writeComplete for a flux buffer
> every frame?

Yes. Calling writeComplete makes the modified buffer available for everyone
to read. If you don't call it, you won't see the changes.

-yair

-- 
\_________  \_____  \__    \__  \_____        
\_________  \_____   \__   \__  \_____         Yair Kurzion
       \__     \__   \____\__      \__         yair++at++sgi.com
       \__          \__  \__                  (650) 933-6502
       \__          \__   \__          
       \__          \__    \__

Next message: Dirk Scheffter: "Hurray, isect problem solved!"
Previous message: Allan Schaffer: "Re: Performer 2.4.2 for linux and multiprocess"
In reply to: Dirk Scheffter: "RE: isect"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 13:56:49 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.