From: Bram Stolk (bram++at++sara.nl)
Date: 09/19/2001 01:48:23
Robert Praxmarer wrote:
>
> Hi,
> anyone of you working with the configuration stated in the subject ?
> Because this turns out to be terrible slow.
>
> Our config:
> CAVELib 3.0
> Performer 2.4
> Elsa Gladiac 920 Geforce3
On our GeForceII, I never had any performance problems, until
last week!
We have this 1 dataset that has terrible performance (suddenly).
May have to do with the version nr of the nvidia driver?
Anyway, the fps went from 0.1 to 30 or so, when I run X in 16bpp
instead of 24/32 bpp.
This was with cavelib3, pf2.4, and real tracking, non-simulator.
(ascension spacepad)
Other datasets remain OK, in both 24/32 and 16 bpp.
Bram
>
> tested with different linux distributions and with different nvidia drivers
> including the newest one.
>
> It seems that the problem is because of the CAVELib, because Performer
> without CAVELib is very fine.
> But when using CAVELib there seems to be some kind of timeout or lock
> problem.
>
> Help and comments greatly appreciated,
> bye cubic.
>
> Ars Electronica Futurelab.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> Open Development Project: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bram Stolk, VR Specialist. SARA Academic Computing Services Amsterdam, PO Box 94613, 1090 GP AMSTERDAM email: bram++at++sara.nl Phone +31-20-5923059 Fax +31-20-6683167"I heard if you play the NT-4.0-CD backwards, you get a satanic message." "Thats nothing, if you play it forward, it installs NT-4.0" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 19 2001 - 01:48:52 PDT