ipaste + libmovie for linux ?

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Robert Praxmarer (cubic++at++fl.aec.at)
Date: 08/25/2001 02:32:50


Hi,
we are currently porting to linux, and I wonder if anyone knows if there are
adequat ports or look-a-likes for the ipaste tool and the libmovie for
linux.
pfThanx cubic.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Radomir Mech
To: Andreas.Ekstrand++at++saab.se
Cc: info-performer
Sent: 8/21/01 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Non-symmetric fog?

Andreas Ekstrand wrote:
>
> Hi again!
>
> Do you mean that layered fog can be done with pfVolFog OR with
> pfEarthSky? In that case, is the layered fog in pfEarthSky only
> available in 2.4?
>

Yes, layered fog can be done with both, but pfVolFog version has more
controls.
The fog in pfEarthSky is available also in earlier versions, pfVolFog is
introduced in 2.4.

> Isn't there any way to get this behaviour without multipass rendering?
> Actually I don't need certain layers. I just need to control the glFog
> with more that just the z value. Isn't it possible to give the glFog a
> function that depends on both z and (h,p,r) to calculate its fog?
>

No, glFog depends only on z. There is an extension glFogCoord1fEXT,
supported on
NVidia and ATI chips, I believe, that allows you to specify z per
vertex. You
would have to compute the z value yourself or use a vertex program to do
it.
Then you don't have to draw the scene twice. This functionality is not
exposed
in performer.
 
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
Open Development Project: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/performer/
             Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
         Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 25 2001 - 02:33:54 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.