pre-cull return value question

From: Sebastian Capella (scapella++at++gstone.com)
Date: 06/27/2001 11:25:22

• Next message: Brian K. Cooper: "Performer seg faulting under linux (resend)"
• Previous message: Gullapalli Nageswara Rao: "Matrimonial site"
• Next in thread: Dorosky, Christopher G: "RE: pre-cull return value question"
• Reply: Dorosky, Christopher G: "RE: pre-cull return value question"

Hi,

I would like some verification on this:

I am looking at the precull return value.

It appears that returning any value != PFTRAV_CONT results in termination of
the cull without further testing or postcull callback triggering.

I am just curious as to what the intent is here.. is it to make the cull
determination entirely within the precull callback?

I am trying to weigh this approach in comparison to using pfCullResult().

I guess what I would like to understand is the varying philosopies of each
approach.

So any help you could provide would be very.. helpful.

Thanks

Sebastian

• Next message: Brian K. Cooper: "Performer seg faulting under linux (resend)"
• Previous message: Gullapalli Nageswara Rao: "Matrimonial site"
• Next in thread: Dorosky, Christopher G: "RE: pre-cull return value question"
• Reply: Dorosky, Christopher G: "RE: pre-cull return value question"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 27 2001 - 11:26:02 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.