Re: unresolved symbol

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: George Koharchik (georgek++at++skopen.rsc.raytheon.com)
Date: 05/25/2001 05:20:41


 
> I have -fullwarn as a CC option but got no warning about iopen
> being UNDEF (as are 420 other symbols in my copy of libpf.so),
> so unless I should be using a different full warning flag, the
> warning is being suppressed. OR do I also need to put fullwarn
> in the LFLAGS?
  If you add "-no_unresolved" to your linker options, will that
give you a compile-time warning ?

gpk


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 25 2001 - 05:21:22 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.