RE: IR3 performance

From: Ran Yakir (ryakir++at++vizrt.com)
Date: 05/10/2001 13:05:09

• Next message: John Kelso: "Re: simple spotlight question"
• Previous message: Paul John Rajlich: "Re: IR3 performance"
• Maybe in reply to: Volodymyr Kindratenko: "IR3 performance"

The performance is exactly that of IR2. The difference is in texture memory
size. IR3 has 256MB while IR2 has only 64MB

Ran

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volodymyr Kindratenko [mailto:kindr++at++ncsa.uiuc.edu]
> Sent: Thu, May 10, 2001 9:32 PM
> To: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Subject: IR3 performance
>
>
>
> This is a bit off-subject, but does anybody know what
> is the polygon/second
> performance for SGI InfiniteReality3? I could only find
> numbers for IR
> (10.9M p/s) and IR2 (13.1M p/s).
>
> *
> Volodymyr Kindratenko
> NCSA, UIUC
> *
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> Open Development Project: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>

• Next message: John Kelso: "Re: simple spotlight question"
• Previous message: Paul John Rajlich: "Re: IR3 performance"
• Maybe in reply to: Volodymyr Kindratenko: "IR3 performance"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 10 2001 - 13:05:27 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.