Re: Misc remarks on the docs

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Allan Schaffer (allan++at++sgi.com)
Date: 04/04/2001 13:59:58


On Apr 4, 10:28pm, Gernot Ziegler wrote:
> Just a general remark to the website designers of
> www.sgi.com/software/performer:
>
> I find it slightly puzzling that these pages are in no way pointing out
> that there are IRIS Performer Class Reference Guides for both C and C++ -
> it took me a while now to find out where I could find good documentation
> for the function calls of e g libpfutil (it is only mentioned, but never
> thoroughly referenced)

I see what you mean. [For anyone wondering, the reference guides
contained the man pages.] The hard-copy class reference guides were
retired after Performer 2.2, so their web equivalents were taken off
when we revamped the web site for Performer 2.4. They'd be somewhat
out of date now. I see how they would be useful though. Though
after installing the software you'll have the manpages on your
system, they are part of performer_dev.

We also used to have a 'man page search engine' live on the site but
also retired that after Performer 2.2 since it had numerous security
flaws and wasn't getting enough hits to justify rewriting a bunch of
cgi-bin. That's why IRIX folks will notice that the 2.4 CD does not
contain performer_tools.

> Quite some programming examples have also some nasty typos in them - if
> someone from SGI shows interest I can point out some errors ... :-)

Sure, send them my way. Or even better, suggest the changes on
info-performer-dev++at++oss.sgi.com, our mailing list for the Open
Development parts of Performer. http://oss.sgi.com/projects/performer/
for more info.

Allan

-- 
Allan Schaffer                                            allan++at++sgi.com
Silicon Graphics                           http://reality.sgi.com/allan


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:00:15 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.