Re: Intersection testing

From: Mario Veraart (Veraart++at++fel.tno.nl)
Date: 02/16/2001 02:25:04

• Next message: Mario Veraart: "Re: Adding and removing polygons"
• Previous message: fauzee.nasir: "Hide/disable cursor while running performer perfly"
• In reply to: Boris Mansencal: "Re: Intersection testing"
• Next in thread: Angus Dorbie: "Re: Intersection testing"
• Next in thread: Tomlinson, Gordon: "RE: Intersection testing"

Boris Mansencal wrote:
>
> Angus Dorbie wrote:
> >
> > Looks like I was wrong the hit array is for multiple segments (as you
> > suggest).
> >
> > Looks like you'd need to use callback to get access to all the segments.
>
> I don't really understand your answer. Why would I need to use callback
> ?

If you read the manual page of pfNode about intersection and
callbacks the answer will be clear.
Take a look at

          PFTRAV_IS_IGNORE
               Indicates that the current intersection should be ignored,
               otherwise the intersection is taken as valid.

Mario

• Next message: Mario Veraart: "Re: Adding and removing polygons"
• Previous message: fauzee.nasir: "Hide/disable cursor while running performer perfly"
• In reply to: Boris Mansencal: "Re: Intersection testing"
• Next in thread: Angus Dorbie: "Re: Intersection testing"
• Next in thread: Tomlinson, Gordon: "RE: Intersection testing"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 16 2001 - 02:26:23 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.