Re: 2.3->2.4 == SegFault

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Tom Flynn (flynnt++at++engr.sgi.com)
Date: 12/09/2000 12:40:04

It appears as though the licensing check failed and the licensing code we
link with then segfaulted. This is the first time we've seen a failed
license check do that. Verify that you have a license.dat in
/usr/share/Performer/. Or if you have $LM_LICENSE_FILE set, verify that
it is set to the correct non-empty license file.
hope that helps,
tom

On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, ross::barna wrote:

>
> an app which ran fine under pf for linux 2.3 is giving a segfault:
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x40337ee6 in lc_errstring () from /usr/lib/libpf.so.1
> (gdb) up
> #1 0x402f8a80 in _pfExplainLicenseFailure () from /usr/lib/libpf.so.1
> (gdb) up
> #2 0x402ec8f3 in pfInit () from /usr/lib/libpf.so.1
> (gdb) up
> #3 0x8058b05 in eScreenDisplay::create (this=0x81a2a90)
> at eScreenDisplay.c++:32
> 32 pfInit();
>
> _________________________________________________________________
>
>
> So, I am going to uninstall all my performer stuff and reinstall, but
> I thought I followed the instructions correctly. Besides, the sample code
> (ie: perfly and rotorwash) seem to compile and run fine.
>
> help!
>
> -ross
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
> 

--
"Mongooses are famous for their snake-fighting ability, and are
 almost always victorious because of their speed, agility, and timing
 and also because of their thick coat."

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 09 2000 - 12:40:07 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.