Re: pfuSaveImage,dmconvert

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Bryan Walsh (bryanw++at++earthlink.net)
Date: 06/25/2000 15:15:06


I'm sorry I wasn't very clear in stating what I'm doing... I am using
pfuSaveImage.

Angus Dorbie wrote:

> I think some capture programs automatically adjust the brightness of the
> screen image, I thought this was just gamma but perhaps not. There may
> also be something in your processing path which applies some kind of
> auto gain.
>
> Try using pfuSaveImage to save the screen contents, the command line
> capture utility scrsave may also be of interest.
>
> Cheers,Angus.
>
> bryan wrote:
> >
> > Hi pfAll,
> >
> > This isn't necessarily a performer problem but I was hoping someone
> > could help me out. I'm capturing each frame of Performer application
> > and saving it as a RGB file. If a look at each .rgb file individually
> > they look fine. I am then combing the frames together using dmconvert
> > to make a quicktime movie. The resulting movie "flickers" quite a bit.
> > It is as if the ambient light of the scene is changing throughout the
> > movie. I've tried every possible option with dmconvert that I can think
> > of. Has anybody else experienced a problem like this? Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bryan Walsh
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> > Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> > Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com
>
> --
> For Performer+OpenGL tutorials http://www.dorbie.com/
>
> "In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity."
> --Albert Einstein
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://www.sgi.com/software/performer/
> Submissions: info-performer++at++sgi.com
> Admin. requests: info-performer-request++at++sgi.com


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 25 2000 - 22:00:41 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.