Multipipe over different Xservers was: perfly -M (multipipe)

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Uwe Woessner (woessner++at++hlrs.de)
Date: 06/06/2000 01:08:51

Hello Allan,

We have exactly the problem you describe here. And I asked this question
several times, but did not get an answer.
Is there any workaround?
You say that it can be fixed in a future release, can you specify what
future could mean?
Does it help if we open up a call?

> As I mentioned Performer is currently written to handle the former
> methodology only. You can force it into the latter, but then there
> is a glitch if you explicitly open (via pfOpenWSConnection) windows
> on pipes numbered :0.0 :1.0 :2.0 -- Performer thinks they're all on
> the same screen (0) and serializes the DRAW process of each -- but
> although the debate rages on this is something that can be fixed for
> a future release.

Regards,
 Uwe 

-- 
               \\\|///  *Rechenzentrum Universitaet Stuttgart*
   _I_         ( o o )            *Visualisierung*                 _I_
  (_++at++_)----oo0O--(_)--O0oo----------------------------------------(_++at++_)
   | |      Uwe Woessner      woessner++at++rus.uni-stuttgart.de        | |
   | |         .ooo0       http://www.hlrs.de/people/woessner/     | |
   |_|         (   )  Oooo.      Phone: +49-711-685-5790           |_|
  (_++at++_)---------\ (---(   )---------------------------------------(_++at++_)
    I            \_)   ) /                                          I
                      (_/

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 06 2000 - 01:09:06 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.