Re: performance 2 pipes/6 pipes

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Uwe Woessner (woessner++at++hlrs.de)
Date: 05/18/2000 23:26:30


Hi Luc,
Are you running multiple X servers in the 6 pipe case?
Performer seems to serialize drawing if two pipes are served by
different X servers (e.g. :1.0 :2.0 ...) we had to switch to one X
Server
serving all pipes (:0.1 :0.2 ...), then the drawing is done in parallel.
If this is your problem, try looking at a huge object that can't be
culled
away and you will notice a drop to half the framerate when using two
X servers on two pipes compared to one X server.

I reported this problem a while ago, but did not get an answer...

Regards,
 Uwe
> We have a Vega application running on an Onyx2 IR2, 2 pipes, 8xR10K,
> Irix 6.5.3f. Each pipe is driving 2 channels at 1280x1024. The
> performance on that system are correct (30 hz and the CPUs are not too
> busy) eve when targets are moving.
>
> When we are running the same application (using just a different adf
> file for the pipes/channels configuration) on an Onyx2 IR2, 6 pipes,
> 16xR10K, Irix 6.5.5m (each pipe still driving 2 channels at 1280x1024),
> the performance are poor. The frame rate drops rapidly under 30 Hz (when
> targets start moving) but none of the processors are running at 100%.
>...

-- 
               \\\|///  *Rechenzentrum Universitaet Stuttgart*
   _I_         ( o o )            *Visualisierung*                 _I_
  (_++at++_)----oo0O--(_)--O0oo----------------------------------------(_++at++_)
   | |      Uwe Woessner      woessner++at++rus.uni-stuttgart.de        | |
   | |         .ooo0       http://www.hlrs.de/people/woessner/     | |
   |_|         (   )  Oooo.      Phone: +49-711-685-5790           |_|
  (_++at++_)---------\ (---(   )---------------------------------------(_++at++_)
    I            \_)   ) /                                          I
                      (_/


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 18 2000 - 23:26:26 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.