Re: glDeleteHandle of pfTextures

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Angus Dorbie (dorbie++at++sgi.com)
Date: 04/06/2000 14:34:37

I think I may have been mistaken about what happens on applying a
pfTexture with a deleted gl handle, we're looking into it & will let you
know if the handle is recreated.

Make sure you have a null pointer though, you still have to subload
again to avoid the sudden download hit.

Your observation about the geostates is correct, but like I said that
may be based on a flasehood from me.

christopher.g.dorosky++at++lmco.com wrote:
>
> I don't understand.
>
> Does this mean that it is necessary to redo the geostates(that reference
> that texture) or not? This could be a horrendous performance hit.
> If not, how will the texture know where to go?

>
> If this is a sloppy approach, does performer provide a clean approach?

This is a loaded question :-)

If Performer offered an alternative I'd have told you about it by now.

CHeers,Angus. 

-- 
For Performer+OpenGL tutorials http://www.dorbie.com/

"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." 
 --Albert Einstein

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 06 2000 - 14:34:41 PDT

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.