Re: Performer & Insure++

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Bill Moore (bmoore++at++world.northgrum.com)
Date: 03/09/2000 11:17:37


The URL is http://rtset.co.il/rany

Devrim Erdem wrote:

> tstephe6++at++csc.com wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are considering purchasing Insure++ to help with tracking down
>> memory related
>> problems in IRIX 6.5.x C++ Performer applications.
>>
>> After a short evaluation, Insure++ appears to be fairly useful and
>> superior to
>> Purify, however, I'm interested to hear from other Performer
>> developers about
>> their experiences with Insure++ when they have had to use it in
>> anger with large
>> complex applications (particularly multiprocessed).
>
> I had the chance to evaluate both with performer+vega applications. I
> would prefer printf and Ran Yakirs shared memory tool which really
> found the problems which Purify and Insure missed. I remember that he
> posted a URL a while ago for his tool.
>
>
> --
> /*===============================================
> M. Devrim Erdem devrim++at++infotron.com.tr
> Simulation Software Development
> info(+)TRON, Turkey
> Tel: +90 216 4921002
> Fax: +90 216 3432132
> http://www.infotron-tr.com
> http://abone.turk.net/mderdem
> ===============================================*/
>
>


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 09 2000 - 12:19:26 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.