Re: Performer & Insure++

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Devrim Erdem (devrim++at++infotron.com.tr)
Date: 03/09/2000 09:39:50


tstephe6++at++csc.com wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> We are considering purchasing Insure++ to help with tracking down memory related
> problems in IRIX 6.5.x C++ Performer applications.
>
> After a short evaluation, Insure++ appears to be fairly useful and superior to
> Purify, however, I'm interested to hear from other Performer developers about
> their experiences with Insure++ when they have had to use it in anger with large
> complex applications (particularly multiprocessed).

I had the chance to evaluate both with performer+vega applications. I would prefer printf and Ran Yakirs shared memory tool which really found the
problems which Purify and Insure missed. I remember that he posted a URL a while ago for his tool.

--
/*===============================================
M. Devrim Erdem            devrim++at++infotron.com.tr
                  Simulation Software Development
                              info(+)TRON, Turkey
Tel: +90 216 4921002
Fax: +90 216 3432132
http://www.infotron-tr.com
http://abone.turk.net/mderdem
===============================================*/


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 09 2000 - 09:38:27 PST

This message has been cleansed for anti-spam protection. Replace '++at++' in any mail addresses with the '@' symbol.