Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.1 1/12] S2io: Code cleanup

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> We'll re-verify the patches against latest kernel and resend.
>
> Since the remaining 12 patches are layered on top of the first one,
> it will be tough to re-order the patches at this stage. Also, we'll
> need to rerun the QA cycle to ensure that nothing got broken in
> the process of patch reordering.
> We will certainly keep this in mind for our next submission.
It's not a problem for me, either way you choose.

I just wanted to make sure you that understood that ordering non-fixes 
before fixes could delay the fixes going into the upstream kernel.
Since 2.6.13 is currently in 'release candidate' status, it is only 
taking bug fixes right now.  If [hypothetically] patches had been 
ordered with bug fixes first, I could have sent the fixes into the 
2.6.13 release.  Without such ordering, we must wait until 2.6.14.
        Jeff