| To: | Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Jul 2005 19:34:11 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42CAAE2F.5070807@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050704.154712.63128211.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42C9BE69.2070008@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42C9BEF6.4080402@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050704.160140.21591849.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42CA390C.9000801@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050705115108.GE16076@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42CA8555.9050607@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050705134805.GH16076@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42CAAE2F.5070807@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Eric Dumazet <42CAAE2F.5070807@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-07-05 17:58 > I'm using vanilla 2.6.12 : no -funroll-loop in it. Maybe in your tree, not > on 99.9% of 2.6.12 trees. > > Are you suggesting everybody should use this compiler flag ? > I dont know about loopback optimization, I am not involved with this stuff, > maybe you think I'm another guy ? > > It seems to me you give unrelated arguments. Do as you wish, I don't feel like argueing about micro optimizations. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TG3]: About hw coalescing infrastructure., Eric Dumazet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Msi-X on Opterons?, Leonid Grossman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, Eric Dumazet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |