| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sis900 and fedora troubles |
| From: | Daniele Venzano <venza@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:30:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | Damian <res0d26i@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050626085050.GA22215@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1119667765.8496.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050626085050.GA22215@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Il giorno 26/giu/05, alle ore 10:50, Francois Romieu ha scritto: The exact revisions for both kernels are needed as a start. The completedmesg would be welcome as well (if it gets truncated, the missing bitsare probably stored in some distro-specific localtion, see /var/log forinstance).So far it is not even clear if it should be bugzilled in Fedora or in Ubuntu (anyway, if changes can not be tested due to the lack of connection... :o/ ). I asked Damian (but forgot to CC the list) to check the sis900 driver version strings printed by the two configurations. I fear that Fedora is still using an old version of sis900, as I remember to have fixed a similar issue on the same hardware. -- Daniele Venzano http://www.brownhat.org |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: BCM5721(tg3)&MSI, Krzysztof Oledzki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "safer ipv4 reassembly" (fwd), Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sis900 and fedora troubles, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | BCM5721(tg3)&MSI, Krzysztof Oledzki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |