On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:37:32PM +1000, herbert wrote:
>
> The advantage of this is that we won't have to rely on the interrupt
> to occur after setting SYNC. The disadvantage is that on certain
> architectures (sparc64 obviously :) we're now doing the relatively
> expensive bit operations on each IRQ.
Actually, why don't we utilise the existing synchronize_irq mechanism?
Here is what we could do.
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
p
Description: Text document
|