| To: | Alejandro Bonilla <abonilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem |
| From: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:00:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, James Ketrenos <jketreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ipw2100-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42A8FF03.3010508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200506090909.55889.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050608.231657.59660080.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050609104205.GD3169@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050609.125324.88476545.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42A8AE2A.4080104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42A8F758.2060008@xxxxxxxxx> <42A8FF03.3010508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi!
> OK. I understand the point and I totally agree with this. We really want
> the adapter to just do what the user or profiles ask the adapter to do.
> Yes, in an ideal world.
>
> Let's talk about easyness. These adapters are in laptops. You don't want
> to type a lot of stop everytime you move from access points, reboots
> and
We are not trying to make it hard to the users. Lets do the right
thing in kernel, and let userspace make it easy.
Pavel
|
| Previous by Date: | [no subject], Zoran Bosic (ZG/ETK) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, John Stoffel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, Alejandro Bonilla |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, John Stoffel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |