| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem |
| From: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:30:22 +0300 |
| Cc: | jketreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pavel@xxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ipw2100-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050608.232020.115912376.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200506090903.49295.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200506090917.23853.vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050608.232020.115912376.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.4 |
On Thursday 09 June 2005 09:20, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:17:23 +0300 > > > Sadly, realities are such that we have to live somehow > > with closed-source firmware. > > You have a choice, buy products from friendly vendors. I am trying! So far, I have Prism2.5, Prism54 and acx111 cards, and all of them require closed binary fw. > I use prism54 cards in my laptops for this reason. ?! As far as I remember, it needs a fw and fw is not open... did that change recently? > If you like a vendor's products who aren't friendly, try > to voice intelligently your opinion to them as to why users > will benefit from them fixing the firmware situation. -- vda |
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |