[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ipw2100: firmware problem

To: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ipw2100: firmware problem
From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:33:10 +0800
Cc: James Ketrenos <jketreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Netdev list <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James P. Ketrenos" <ipw2100-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050608223437.GB2614@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intel Corp.
References: <20050608142310.GA2339@xxxxxxxxxx> <42A723D3.3060001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050608212707.GA2535@xxxxxxxxxx> <42A76719.2060700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050608223437.GB2614@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Pavel,

On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 00:34 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Actually it would still transmit when user did not want it to. I
> believe that staying "quiet" is right thing, long-term. And it could
> solve firmware-loading problems, short-term...

If ipw2100 is built into kernel, you can disable it by kernel parameter
ipw2100.disable=1. Then you can enable it with:

$ echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/ipw2100/*/rf_kill

> How long does association with AP take? Anyway it should be easy to
> tell driver to associate ASAP, just after the insmod...

Are you suggesting by default it is disabled for built into kernel but
enabled as a module?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>