| To: | jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:31:51 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx, mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506071852290.31708@ladlxr> |
| References: | <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0450C01F@orsmsx408> <20050607.132159.35660612.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506071852290.31708@ladlxr> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:20:37 -0700 (PDT) > I'm looking forward to trying the split out patches tomorrow. Don't get too excited, those are purely bug fixes and don't actually do the actual "Super TSO" part yet. I'm trying to test the cleanups leading up to the actual TSO segmenting change to make sure any such regressions therein get weeded out. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Jesse Brandeburg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Jesse Brandeburg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |