| To: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:09:47 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050606230437.GA7172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050606124043.GA625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050606.154653.64001264.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050606230437.GA7172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:04:37 +1000 > Bigger is better actually :) I'm now thinking of using the > memory occupied by the frags array for IPsec crypto operations. > So if it's bigger then it simply means that we can store more > fragments. So you want to use this area as a sort-of temporary scratch pad for something other than scatterlist information? That's interesting if so... |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |