| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | PATCH: explicit typing WAS(Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:04:52 -0400 |
| Cc: | tgraf@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050531.153125.95894437.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | unknown |
| References: | <1117197157.6688.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050531.144338.112623594.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050531222646.GK15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050531.153125.95894437.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2005-31-05 at 15:31 -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:26:46 +0200 > > > > Please use explicit "unsigned int flags" instead of "unsigned flags". > > > > I converted this already in the two patches later in the thread. > > I see, thanks for pointing this out. > If you want to do it right, it should be a u16 actually ;-> In any case since we are being gracious - lets fix where i cutnpasted it from using TheLinuxWay ;-> ------------- This patch converts "unsigned flags" to use more explict types like u16 instead and incrementally introduces NLMSG_NEW(). Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> cheers, jamal
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Problems with Broadcom and Intel PRO/1000 cards, Alejandro Bonilla |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: explicit typing WAS(Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |