netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

PATCH: explicit typing WAS(Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: PATCH: explicit typing WAS(Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:04:52 -0400
Cc: tgraf@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050531.153125.95894437.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: unknown
References: <1117197157.6688.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050531.144338.112623594.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050531222646.GK15391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050531.153125.95894437.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2005-31-05 at 15:31 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:26:46 +0200
> 
> > > Please use explicit "unsigned int flags" instead of "unsigned flags".
> > 
> > I converted this already in the two patches later in the thread.
> 
> I see, thanks for pointing this out.
> 

If you want to do it right, it should be a u16 actually ;->

In any case since we are being gracious - lets fix where i cutnpasted it
from using TheLinuxWay ;->


-------------
This patch converts "unsigned flags" to use more explict types like u16
instead and incrementally introduces NLMSG_NEW().
 
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> 


cheers,
jamal

Attachment: expl_p
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>