| To: | "Atul Sabharwal" <iamatul@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 08:59:24 -0700 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <009201c56280$e9b7cd00$0202a8c0@ATULSPC> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <20050526110425.27590eb8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050526.144638.71091166.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050526154857.3cb34d11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050526.155401.18310361.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <009201c56280$e9b7cd00$0202a8c0@ATULSPC> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 26 May 2005 22:57:05 -0700 "Atul Sabharwal" <iamatul@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have a question about using the 802.1d driver with a switch. I have a > managed switch > which connects to the Xscale MAC using a Reverse MII interface. > > It seems that the 802.1d bridge puts the interface into promiscuous mode and > needs multiple > ethernet devices to work with. Can it work with a single ethernet device > which is connected > to a BCM5338 ( broadcomm 8 port switch chip ). Why? what would you gain? > I understand that I would have to change the STP configuration component to > write to the > broadcomm chip. You would be better off writing a different driver, the amount of shared logic would be less than the per hardware logic. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4] IPv4/IPv6: UDP Large Send Offload feature, Ravinandan Arakali |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization, Atul Sabharwal |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4] IPv4/IPv6: UDP Large Send Offload feature, ravinandan . arakali |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |