netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: shemminger@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050526154857.3cb34d11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050526110425.27590eb8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050526.144638.71091166.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050526154857.3cb34d11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:48:57 -0700

> So the call chain is bounded (ie not related to number of filters)
> but slightly longer.

You're right, thanks for the explanation Stephen.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH linux-2.6.12-rc4-mm1] ethtool: Add NETIF_F_HW_CSUM support, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:  Re: [Bridge] Re: [PATCH] (6/6) bridge: receive path optimization, Atul Sabharwal
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]