| To: | eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] bonding using arp_ip_target may stay down with active path |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 May 2005 17:37:18 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | fubar@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1116959462.8954.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200505232121.j4NLLaYa000837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1116959200.8954.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1116959462.8954.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:31:02 -0400 > It ate my tabs again. This mailer is going out the window. This is why I personally stick to Emacs/MEW and Sylpheed. I tried Evolution for a while long ago, but stopped the first time it refused to read in my entire mbox because it failed to parse a multi-byte character in _one_ of the emails contained within. I'm sure that's fixed, but it's very much a non-ascii-text mailer by default, so you have to pluck with it's configuration a little bit if you're sending patches and code around a lot. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Super TSO v3, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Super TSO v3, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] bonding using arp_ip_target may stay down with active path, Eric Paris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] bonding using arp_ip_target may stay down with active path, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |