| To: | "David S.Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706 |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 May 2005 20:01:23 -0400 |
| Cc: | mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ffan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lusinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050520.164504.31639000.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050520194220.GA18259@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050520.152836.48528379.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <428E72F9.3070404@xxxxxxxxx> <20050520.164504.31639000.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050328 Fedora/1.7.6-1.2.5 |
David S.Miller wrote: From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 19:30:01 -0400Sure. What I'm driving at is that a checksum of zero seems to imply CHECKSUM_NONE not CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. tg3 only does the 0xffff check.Sure, both ways are fine. huh? They are pretty different... one says "Checksum all good, dude" and the other says "I didn't checksum, do it in software for me."
right?
Jeff
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706, Michael Chan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706, Michael Chan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |