[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem

To: akpm@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050518234552.4aef6d02.akpm@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050518222729.007887b8.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <1116484313.21310.78.camel@uganda> <20050518234552.4aef6d02.akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:45:52 -0700

> > Should I ask David Miller to allocate new one specially for connector?
> Dave?

Giving the connector a single value 10 is OK, the rest of
what the connector is doing in this area is not.

I wish you hadn't put the connector into -mm, it's really
in need of several fixups still.  The bogus reuse of the
ULOG netlink number is simply indicative of that.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>