|To:||"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded|
|From:||John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 17 May 2005 23:47:48 -0400|
|References:||<46332e5aa197db91aaf012cf140282b4@xxxxxxx> <20050517.192829.71087792.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0dd16bed0ea56242244bab0a7f1cf372@xxxxxxx> <20050517.200015.55506861.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
On May 17, 2005, at 11:00 PM, David S. Miller wrote:
From: John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:51:53 -0400With the new patch I'm getting 78.0%.Thanks for testing. I actually expected the new code to do better. Splitting could be a little bit expensive, but that only occurs at the beginning of the connection as we ramp up the congestion and send window. Afterwards, we should be able to release full unsplit TSO frames onto the wire.
With different (larger than default) buffer sizes, I'm getting 63.4%. Not surprising I guess.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, David S. Miller|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH] NUMA aware allocation of transmit and receive buffers for e1000, Christoph Lameter|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, David S. Miller|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, David S. Miller|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|