netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly

To: ak@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx, akepner@xxxxxxx, jheffner@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050517211300.GB79960@xxxxxx>
References: <20050517202730.GA79960@xxxxxx> <20050517.140245.71090021.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050517211300.GB79960@xxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: 17 May 2005 23:13:01 +0200,Tue, 17 May 2005 23:13:00 +0200

> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:02:45PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
> > Date: 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200,Tue, 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200
> > 
> > > But it's not clear such a hack would be worth it anyways. 
> > > If anything it would be probably better to let mountd set the RTTs, e.g. 
> > > implicitely with MSG_CONFIRM (I hope it is using it these days ...) 
> > 
> > I think we should implement a solution that goes beyond
> > the confines of NFS.
> 
> Nothing in MSG_CONFIRM is NFS specific.

I'm referring to mountd.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>