| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch linux-2.6.12-rc3-mm3 1/7] r8169: de-obfuscate supported PCI ID |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 May 2005 22:48:11 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4287C9D6.1060004@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050504221057.1e02a402.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050505115502.GA4414@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050505110052.62c1c2cb.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050505225656.GA11200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4287C9D6.1060004@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : > All seven look OK, but it failed on the first patch: > > [jgarzik@pretzel netdev-2.6]$ dotest /g/tmp/mbox > > Applying 'r8169: de-obfuscate supported PCI ID' > > patching file drivers/net/r8169.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 174. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/r8169.c.rej Yes. In the meantime, -mm was applied: [patch 2.6.12-rc2-mm3 1/1] r8169: new PCI id Should I send a serie of patches against 126fa4b9ca5d9d7cb7d46f779ad3bd3631ca387c to update it to r8169-mm-latest ? -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch linux-2.6.12-rc3-mm3 1/7] r8169: de-obfuscate supported PCI ID, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 3/3] tg3: Fix tg3_restart_ints(), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |