netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly

from [Rick Jones] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:56:55 -0700
In-reply-to: <20050517.115020.119241057.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505170914130.29021@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050517.104947.112621738.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1zmut7l5q.fsf@xxxxxx> <20050517.115020.119241057.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; HP-UX 9000/785; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 
I already know it happens, and that IBM has gotten NFS corruption due
to this problem. 

Frankengrams can be fun :)


Using NFS over UDP is stupid.

I find it ironic to claim that folks are "stuck with UDP over NFS" but
were able to upgrade their networking technology to gigabit.


It would seem new NIC drivers ship more easily than new NFS/OS bits in some 
places.

rick  jones
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, John Heffner
Previous by Thread:  Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, John Heffner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]