Re: [PATCH] [SCHED] Fix unlock spinlock in error path

netdev

Re: [PATCH] [SCHED] Fix unlock spinlock in error path

To:	"Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] [SCHED] Fix unlock spinlock in error path
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 16 May 2005 22:12:33 +0200
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0505162224420.20204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0505161555080.13294@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050516134900.GC13748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505162224420.20204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

* Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE 
<Pine.LNX.4.62.0505162224420.20204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-16 22:25
> Thanks Thomas for the explication!
> Sorry for the noise.

Don't worry, I should have documented this weird code part. ;->

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] [SCHED] Fix unlock spinlock in error path, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE Re: [PATCH] [SCHED] Fix unlock spinlock in error path, Thomas Graf Re: [PATCH] [SCHED] Fix unlock spinlock in error path, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE Re: [PATCH] [SCHED] Fix unlock spinlock in error path, Thomas Graf <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Interdomain/interpartition communication without a checksum, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] bonding using arp_ip_target may stay down with active path, Jay Vosburgh
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] [SCHED] Fix unlock spinlock in error path, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] Use pci_set_dma_mask() instead of direct assignment of DMA mask, Tobias Klauser
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]