| To: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] TCP congestion infrastructure |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:11 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | baruch@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, doug.leith@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050509162214.0a8c9ceb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050506173729.20140.93205.37072@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050509162214.0a8c9ceb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> Subject: [RFC] TCP congestion infrastructure Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:22:14 -0700 > I rebased the H-TCP patches on my current work and 2.6.12-rc4 and put them in > http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/patches/2.6.12-rc4-tcp/ > > Includes infrastructure and all the current variants: BIC, Westwood, Vegas > plus H-TCP, Hybla I like it. Looks fine from here. This, along with the TSO reworking, will go in at the next opportunity which is likely 2.6.13 of course. I'm considering putting the TSO stuff into 2.6.12 because in many ways it is a bug fix, TSO is fairly broken without it. There are some loose ends I need to resolve first though. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFC] TCP congestion infrastructure, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: forcing a packet to go through hw net device, Sumit |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] TCP congestion infrastructure, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] TCP congestion infrastructure, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |