| To: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: primary and secondary ip addresses |
| From: | Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 8 May 2005 15:31:15 +0300 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrea G Forte <andreaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050412105442.GV7510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Elion Enterprises Ltd. |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412171621200.15793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1103550901.1050.292.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050412105442.GV7510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8 |
Harald Welte wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:55:02AM -0500, jamal wrote: > > > Didnt boot ;-> > > A small silly magic number i missed. Now boots - but doesnt mean it > > works. And i dont have much time to spare chasing it. > > Due to a customer having again trouble with this issue, I was forced to > actually spend some time testing it (and merging it to a current > kernel). At least in my simple tests, it worked like a charm :) I'm using it for some weeks in production and haven't noticed any issues either. Would be really good to see it kernel. regards, -- Hasso Tepper Elion Enterprises Ltd. WAN administrator |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SFQ: Reordering?, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [7/7] [IPSEC] Add XFRMA_SA/XFRMA_POLICY for delete notification, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] bug-fix in multipath_drr.c, pravin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: primary and secondary ip addresses, Harald Welte |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |