netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/ixgb/: possible cleanups

from [Christoph Hellwig] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Ganesh Venkatesan <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/ixgb/: possible cleanups
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 13:40:41 +0100
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, ayyappan.veeraiyan@xxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5fc59ff3050506153523cd12dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ganesh Venkatesan <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>, ayyappan.veeraiyan@xxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20050506211834.GM3590@xxxxxxxxx> <5fc59ff3050506153523cd12dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i 
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:35:52PM -0700, Ganesh Venkatesan wrote:
> Adrian:
> 
> Some of your suggestions are already part of the driver we are
> currently testing. This was based partly on your Feb '05 patch. We
> will not be able to apply your patch as is since some of the changes
> are in part of code that is shared with other drivers that are not
> GPLd.

I don't think Adrian can claim copyright on code removal even if he
wanted to (which I doubt :))
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/ixgb/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk
Next by Date:  Re: [7/7] [IPSEC] Add XFRMA_SA/XFRMA_POLICY for delete notification, jamal
Previous by Thread:  Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/ixgb/: possible cleanups, Arjan van de Ven
Next by Thread:  [2.6 patch] drivers/net/e1000/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]